Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
AJPM Focus ; : 100117, 2023 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20230701

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic abruptly impacted health care service delivery and utilization. However, the impact on older adults with diabetes in the United States is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To estimate changes in health care utilization among older adults with diabetes during the initial 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the 2 years before, and to examine the variation in utilization changes by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In this study, we analyzed changes in utilization, measured by the average use of health care services per 1,000 persons with diabetes, using medical claims for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 67 years and above. Utilization changes by setting (acute inpatient, emergency room [ER], hospital outpatient, physician office, and ambulatory surgery center [ASC]) and by media (telehealth and in-person) were examined for 22 months of the pandemic (03/2020-12/2021) compared with pre-pandemic period (03/2018-12/2019). We also estimated utilization changes by beneficiaries' age group, sex, race/ethnicity, and residential urbanicity. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of approximately 6 million beneficiaries with diabetes each month. In the first 2 years of the pandemic, the average use of health care services by setting was 5-17% lower than the pre-pandemic level for all types of services. Phase 1 (03/2020-05/2020) had the largest decrease in utilization: physician office visits changed by -51.2% (95% CI, -55.0% to -47.5%), ASC procedures by -45.1% (95% CI, -49.8% to -40.4%), ER visits by -36.9% (95% CI, -39.0% to -34.7%), acute inpatient stays by -31.5% (95% CI, -33.6% to -29.3%), and hospital outpatient visits by -27% (95% CI, -29.3% to -24.8%). The reduction in utilization varied by sociodemographic subgroup. During the pandemic, the use of telehealth visits increased by 511.1% (95% CI, 502.2% to 520.0%) compared to the pre-pandemic period. The increase was smaller among rural residents. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes experienced a reduction in the use of health care services during the COVID-19 pandemic, some of which persisted through two years into the pandemic. Telehealth visits increased, but not enough to overcome decreases in in-person visits. Understanding these patterns may help to optimize the use of health care resources for diabetes management in the post-pandemic era and during future emergencies.

2.
Diabetes Care ; 44(8): 1788-1796, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2109595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether risk of severe outcomes among patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) differs from that of patients without diabetes or with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the Premier Healthcare Database Special COVID-19 Release records of patients discharged after COVID-19 hospitalization from U.S. hospitals from March to November 2020 (N = 269,674 after exclusion), we estimated risk differences (RD) and risk ratios (RR) of intensive care unit admission or invasive mechanical ventilation (ICU/MV) and of death among patients with T1DM compared with patients without diabetes or with T2DM. Logistic models were adjusted for age, sex, and race or ethnicity. Models adjusted for additional demographic and clinical characteristics were used to examine whether other factors account for the associations between T1DM and severe COVID-19 outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with patients without diabetes, T1DM was associated with a 21% higher absolute risk of ICU/MV (RD 0.21, 95% CI 0.19-0.24; RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.43-1.56) and a 5% higher absolute risk of mortality (RD 0.05, 95% CI 0.03-0.07; RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24-1.57), with adjustment for age, sex, and race or ethnicity. Compared with T2DM, T1DM was associated with a 9% higher absolute risk of ICU/MV (RD 0.09, 95% CI 0.07-0.12; RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.22), but no difference in mortality (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89-1.13). After adjustment for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) occurring before or at COVID-19 diagnosis, patients with T1DM no longer had increased risk of ICU/MV (RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03) and had lower mortality (RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.01) in comparisons with patients with T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T1DM hospitalized for COVID-19 are at higher risk for severe outcomes than those without diabetes. Higher risk of ICU/MV in patients with T1DM than in patients with T2DM was largely accounted for by the presence of DKA. These findings might further guide recommendations related to diabetes management and the prevention of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , COVID-19 Testing , Hospitalization , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 23(7): 961-967, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1956792

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: More information is needed to understand the clinical epidemiology of children and young adults hospitalized with diabetes and COVID-19. We describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients <21 years old hospitalized with COVID-19 and either Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM or T2DM) during peak incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. METHODS: This is a descriptive sub-analysis of a retrospective chart review of patients aged <21 years hospitalized with COVID-19 in six US children's hospitals during July-August 2021. Patients with COVID-19 and either newly diagnosed or known T1DM or T2DM were described using originally collected data and diabetes-related data specifically collected on these patients. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and diabetes, 34 had T1DM and 24 had T2DM. Of those with T1DM and T2DM, 26% (9/34) and 33% (8/24), respectively, were newly diagnosed. Among those >12 years old and eligible for COVID-19 vaccination, 93% were unvaccinated (42/45). Among patients with T1DM, 88% had diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and 6% had COVID-19 pneumonia; of those with T2DM, 46% had DKA and 58% had COVID-19 pneumonia. Of those with T1DM or T2DM, 59% and 46%, respectively, required ICU admission. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of considering diabetes in the evaluation of children and young adults presenting with COVID-19; the challenges of managing young patients who present with both COVID-19 and diabetes, particularly T2DM; and the importance of preventive actions like COVID-19 vaccination to prevent severe illness among those eligible with both COVID-19 and diabetes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Young Adult , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/etiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Diabetes ; 71, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1923895

ABSTRACT

The COVID-pandemic has abruptly impacted health care systems. Using data from Medicare claims we examined the pandemic-related changes in health care utilization among fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes. We included persons with diabetes who were aged ≥ 67 and enrolled in both Part A and B programs for all months of the index year and the previous year. Diabetes was identified by having at least one inpatient or two outpatient claims that were diabetes related. We considered utilization by setting (acute inpatient, emergency room, hospital outpatient [HOP], physician office, and ambulatory surgery center [ASC] procedures) and by media (telehealth and in-person) . Utilization was measured as per person use of each type of health care service for each month from Jan. 2018 to Jun. 2021. We quantified the changes in utilization with a fixed-effect model for all post-pandemic months (3/2020-6/2021) and three phases (3/2020-5/2020;6/2020-12/2020;and 1/2021-6/2021) . We found that health care services usage by setting was 8% to 18% lower than the pre-pandemic level (Table) . Phase 1 had the largest decrease in utilization. In phase 3, utilization was still lower than the pre-pandemic level for most service types, except HOP visits and ASC procedures. We also found a large increase in telehealth visits, although the increase was not large enough to compensate for the decrease in in-person office visits.

5.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 187: 109862, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1768028

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To report the national proportions and trends of adult hospitalizations with diabetes in the United States during 2000-2018. METHODS: We used the 2000-2018 National Inpatient Sample to identify hospital discharges with any listed and primary diagnoses for diabetes, based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and ICD-10-CM codes. We calculated proportions and trends of adult hospitalizations with diabetes, overall and by subpopulations. We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database to assess calendar-year and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2018, the proportion of hospitalizations among adults ≥18 years increased from 17.1% to 27.3% (average annual percentage change [AAPC] 2.5%; P < 0.001) for any listed diabetes codes and from 1.5% to 2.1% (AAPC 2.2%; P < 0.001) for primary diagnosis of diabetes. Men, non-Hispanic Black patients, and those from poorer zip codes had higher proportions of hospitalizations with diabetes codes. CONCLUSION: In recent years, approximately one-quarter of adult hospitalizations in the United States had a listed diabetes code, increasing about 2.5% per year from 2000 to 2018. These data are important for benchmarking purposes, especially due to disruptions in health care utilization from the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Patient Readmission , United States/epidemiology
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(25): 795-800, 2020 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-616585

ABSTRACT

On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Subsequently, states enacted stay-at-home orders to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and reduce the burden on the U.S. health care system. CDC* and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)† recommended that health care systems prioritize urgent visits and delay elective care to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in health care settings. By May 2020, national syndromic surveillance data found that emergency department (ED) visits had declined 42% during the early months of the pandemic (1). This report describes trends in ED visits for three acute life-threatening health conditions (myocardial infarction [MI, also known as heart attack], stroke, and hyperglycemic crisis), immediately before and after declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic as a national emergency. These conditions represent acute events that always necessitate immediate emergency care, even during a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic. In the 10 weeks following the emergency declaration (March 15-May 23, 2020), ED visits declined 23% for MI, 20% for stroke, and 10% for hyperglycemic crisis, compared with the preceding 10-week period (January 5-March 14, 2020). EDs play a critical role in diagnosing and treating life-threatening conditions that might result in serious disability or death. Persons experiencing signs or symptoms of serious illness, such as severe chest pain, sudden or partial loss of motor function, altered mental state, signs of extreme hyperglycemia, or other life-threatening issues, should seek immediate emergency care, regardless of the pandemic. Clear, frequent, highly visible communication from public health and health care professionals is needed to reinforce the importance of timely care for medical emergencies and to assure the public that EDs are implementing infection prevention and control guidelines that help ensure the safety of their patients and health care personnel.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Facilities and Services Utilization/trends , Hyperglycemia/therapy , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Stroke/therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL